Green Fuel Gone Residential
Emergence of a quite, efficient, and clean fuel
Fuel cell technology is an emerging form of cleaner energy that seems to be within reach for consumers. The main drawback is in the costly expenses associated with the units, in comparison to conventional fossil fuel systems. Fuel cell systems have proven to produce at least twice as much energy and little to no pollution, unlike their ‘dirty fuel’ counterparts. In 2003, President Bush announced a program called the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative (HFI) which aims to develop hydrogen-based fuel cell technologies. The initiative is supported by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Advanced Energy Initiative of 2006, both organizations hope to make fuel cell technology practical in vehicles and cost-effective for the average citizen.
The by-products of fuel cell technology are water and heat, and some release of CO2. When compared to conventional fossil fuels, this cleaner alternative sounds too good to be true. However, the use of fuel cell technologies is only continuing to grow in numbers as companies strive to develop the perfect fuel cell for the modern day world, commercial and residentially.
______________________________________________________________________
Benefits of fuel cell technology
- The systems are deemed to be environmentally friendly, since they operate with higher efficiency. Conventional fuel systems are only 30% efficient.
- Fuel cells may run on ecologically derived substances like ethanol and methanol.
- Such technology is 3 times more efficient that combustion systems.
- Fuel cells may play a large role in the future of American energy independency.
General cons
- During the burning of substances like ethanol and methanol, some CO2 is ultimately released into the atmosphere. However, the release of this greenhouse gas is less then if it were to be released by burning fossil fuels.
- Maintaining a fuel cell can be very costly. The main downfall is associated with high expenses, currently this technology may not be a reasonable financial choice for many commercial industries.
- Its availability to the public is limited, mostly because of the high costs and little interest. In addition, a majority of marketing as directed on a commercial level.
- Companies are still striving to develop the most effective system, perhaps one that can be incorporated to vehicles.
______________________________________________________________________
Why is fuel cell technology unpopular?
Unlike wind and solar technology, fuel cells do not receive a whole lot of recognition by the media or government incentives. Many believe that user-friendly fuel cells are nearly 10 – 15 years away, thus investing in them now may prove to be just a waste of money. If the technology becomes more efficient and preferred by consumers and producers, then the government will most definitely begin to provide various incentives. However, experts believe that it will take time for this nearly clean-fuel to become widely available, thus incentives have not yet been set.
Many people have not heard of fuel cell technology because it’s simply so hush-hush and new to the residential market. Most companies’ products are still in the development stages. If you are interested in receiving progress notices you may register with your desired organization or company online.
______________________________________________________________________
A company that’s ‘Delivering smart energy today’
The California/Oregon company prides itself as a pioneer and leader of ultra-clean and efficient fuel cell energy systems for small businesses and households. The company states that fuel cell technology is more efficient than wind and solar power, and aims to make it widely available to the masses. ClearEdge Power promises their customers a ‘remedy for painfully high utility bills,’ while encouraging folks to take advantage of the utility rebates and government appointed incentives. In addition, the company strives to educate consumers on the benefits that fuel cell technology has on the environment and its reduced number of carbon emissions.
CEO, Russell Ford, and ClearEdge Power have applauded Congressman Wu and Congresswoman Bono-Mack for taking action to increase fuel cell technologies and incentives. Regarding the 2009 residential Fuel Cell Tax Parity Act, Congressman Wu said,
“As we try to ensure that America has clean and renewable sources of energy, we need to establish policies to help individuals install these technologies and support industries that are already ahead of the curve. This bill will ensure that families have the opportunity to access the same tax credits that commercial developers get for using renewable power.”
The company has already started marketing and selling the ClearEdge 5 (CE5) system, that cost as low as 6.0¢ per kWh. The CE5 product is a good option for an on-site clean energy system as it converts natural gas to electricity and heat. The product consists of three core components and the system’s hydrogen is processed through a Fuel Cell Stack, thus creating direct current (DC) power which the unit converts into the alternative current (AC). It is estimated that the CE5 system generates 5kW annually, which is optimal for larger home estimated at 4,000 square feet.
The CE5 system promises many benefits. A major environmental is that this technology uses fewer natural resources to meet your energy needs, and can be up to 90% efficient. The company promises continual performance monitoring for the 20 year lifespan of the CE5 system. The Clear Edge 5 product is truly a smart energy system that provides reliable alternative energy, low energy costs, and reduced CO2 emissions.
______________________________________________________________________
Other companies competing to meet the fuel cell goal
New York Times reported that Bloom Energy is one of the companies closest to revealing their product. The company ran a successful two year study at the University of Tennessee, where they discovered that their Bloom box ran twice as efficient as a natural-gas boiler, while producing 60% less carbon emissions. It is reported that their product can also be modified to run on natural-gas and liquid fuels, like ethanol. In regards to the company’s product development, they have not been forthcoming with any details.
Bloom’s CEO K.R. Sridhar and Kleiner stated that the company plans on selling and leasing its 5 KW Bloom boxes, in addition to entering power-purchasing agreements through an unnamed wholly owned subsidiary. Six years and nearly $250 million later, Bloom is quickly proving to be a company preparing for commercial sales and worldwide recognition.
SFC is a German company which strives to be a leader in motor vehicle incorporated fuel cells. Unlike other companies that are still in the developmental phases of their projects, SFC has been manufacturing and selling various units since 2000. In addition, the company has 25 patents and patent applications covering the very aspects of clean energy technology.
The company is a true pioneer in direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) technology. The miniaturized DMFC system functions with exchangeable fuel cartridges which contain 100% methanol. Currently their products are sold for recreational vehicles (RV’s), sailing boats, remote industrial applications, and consumer electronics. The company goal is to establish its units throughout various markets from healthcare to households to leisure resorts.
FuelCell Energy manufactures clean energy stationary fuel cell power plants which are estimated to generate electricity with twice the efficiency of fossil fuel plants. The company which is headquartered in Connecticut, manages and monitors over 50 power plant locations throughout the world. The company manufactures stationary fuel cell power plants for commercial, industrial, government, and utility applications.
The products associated with this company qualify under several environmental certifications, such as the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and Renewable Energy Standards (RES). In addition, they exceed the standards set of fuel cell systems by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
______________________________________________________________________
Learn More
HowStuffWorks.com presents: How Fuel Cell Energy Works
Stacking Green Chips in the Silver State
The Sierra Club, SCGH LLC, and its partners are not in any way or form endorsing or recommending any of the products or services listed by any of the providers or advertisers.
October 28th, 2009 at 4:12 pm
This article is really interesting. A little difficult for me to grasp all the information since it’s so new to me, but very informative!
October 28th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
I can always count on this site for the such great green info. Thanks!
October 28th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
Is the research of fuel cell technology extremely expensive?
October 28th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Interesting how fuel cell technology might reach homeowners.
October 28th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
I thought fuel cell tech is expensive, way too much for a homeowner.
October 28th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
I think it will be way too expensive for homeowners for a while. Maybe in 20 years it would be more accessible. Come on, we still have a hard time with the price of solar power!
October 28th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
The price of solar power is expensive! I think we gotta lower that price down before moving to fuel cell technology.
October 28th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
This is what needs to happen! I cannot wait until residential fuel cell technology is further developed and becomes affordable because I’ll be in line waiting! This is also going to make solar technology re-think it’s prices too– this is exciting!
October 29th, 2009 at 7:16 am
There have been thousands of stationary fuel cell installations around the world for years now at places you would never imagine – Bronx Zoo, Whole Foods, Sierra Nevada Brewery (using waste gas from making beer!), Mohegan Sun Casino, Pepperidge Farms, Central Park Police Station, Yale University, Verizon – and so on and so on. Check out http://www.fuelcells.org/info/databasefront.html for a searchable database of worldwide stationary fuel cells and http://www.fuelcells.org/info/statedatabase.html for U.S. ones (including policy, cars and hydrogen stations).
Other countries are heavily invested in residential fuel cells while the U.S. has focused more on backup and primary power for industrial applications. Japan has about 2,000 residential fuel cells installed and is subsidizing the cost to help. Korea has just announced that they will do the same. Germany is very interested in the cogeneration (CHP) benefits of fuel cells which can get up to 85-90% efficiency.
Despite their cost which is rapidly coming down, fuel cells make economic sense today for telecommunications and backup power – the Omaha National Bank in Nebraska has had one for years – if they lose power, it costs them millions of dollars a second, so the fuel cell helps make sure they never do. Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon are all installing them at their cell phone towers.
Very cool and smart technology!
October 29th, 2009 at 9:10 am
It’s so great to see this on the Sierra Club site!
Regarding price, you know, it’s all relative to the price of what we’re paying for electricity otherwise. In Japan, where electricity prices are so much higher, fuel cells are popular for residential use. In the U.S., the focus is more on providing back-up/emergency power, where fuel cells are MUCH more reliable than gasoline generators that have been sitting around or batteries that might unexpectedly lose their charge from sitting outside–therefore the extra cost is worth it. So the hope is that costs will come down from using fuel cells in for these uses and others, and then they’ll be more affordable for other uses. There are lots of cool things happening (if you know where to look!) http://www.h2andyou.org
October 29th, 2009 at 9:18 am
Several companies are already selling fuel cells to commercial customers for use as backup power for things like cell towers, air-to-ground communications and security/surveillance. For them, the incentives are set up and the capital cost is feasible. Maintenance costs are actually less than for generators and batteries. However, taking on the whole consumer market for residential fuel cells requires a larger effort and infrastructure. I’m glad to see some companies are stepping in that direction!
October 29th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
To say fuel cells are not popular is an unfortunate term. Fuel cells are very popular with those who have installed them. They are reducing carbon emissions and providing users with high-quality power and in some cases heat at the point of use.
That said, it is true that fuel cells are not as widely used and don’t receive the attention in the media when compared to wind and solar technologies.
Popularity surrounding alternative technologies is often cyclical, and the lull in attention is not too problematic for the industry. Fuel cells will succeed or fail on their own merits.
And as our society becomes more energy efficient and reduces carbon emissions, the right technologies will be installed at the locations where they make the most sense.
Popularity is a funny thing. Like a high-school clique, an inordinate amount of attention given to one over another is usually not warranted, short-lived and overlooks the good in others.
October 29th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Wow. Just today I read a story about a Hilton in New York that’s been operating a fuel cell for two years and how it’s already paid for itself. And Whole Foods Markets are using fuel cells for peak shaving and to provide backup power so that their freezers don’t shut off when the electricity fails.
“Hush-hush companies”? UTC Power and Ballard are pretty big names.
Costly maintenance? I don’t think so. The point of a fuel cell is that they need almost no maintenance. That’s why all the cell phone providers are switching out batteries for fuel cells on the transmission towers, and companies like Coca-Cola, Wal-Mart and the DoD are trading in battery forklifts for fuel cell forklifts.
Companies not interested in residental systems because of vehicles? Two different things. The auto companies make their own fuel cells and they are a different type than the residential units. Kind of like saying no company wants to develop Wii games because the PlayStation exists.
Limited availability because of high costs? Have you priced rooftop solar? The difference is there’s a big rebate for solar. A bill on the floor now will level the playing field for wind, solar, fuel cells and biogas providing incentives based on kilowatts and CO2 saving instead of technology.
November 5th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
I think that this is a great write. People need to learn more about the opportunities that fuel cell technology can bring. I wish that the websites I saw were a little bit more helpful, but people decide not to share their info, probably because of industry competition.
November 5th, 2009 at 6:24 pm
I don’t think that fuel cell technology is worth the investment. It’s rarely available and is too expensive for any residential project. Stupid. Go with solar instead.
November 5th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
I hope the government is planning on giving residence great incentives for the fuel cell systems. I read that you said, “Its availability to the public is limited, mostly because of the high costs and little interest.” Do you think if the media were to release information more than the public’s awareness would rise and so would the sales.
November 6th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
I already think solar stuff is too expensive, I doubt I can afford this fuel cell technology.
November 6th, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Yolanda, in a few years, actually maybe a decade or so, solar power will be affordable. i think fuel cell technology will be available and picked up by companies, but residents will have a harder time obtaining fuel cell technology as the costs will be too much. We just have to wait.
November 11th, 2009 at 2:53 pm
Is it just me or is anyone else having difficulty grasping the concept of fuel cell technology?
November 11th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
I heard that green fuel technology is actually available, but the government and the oil companies are trying to “cap” it’s progress for fear of losing money. When will we put the environment and our health over financial gain? I hope this is a glimpse of things to come.
November 12th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Jasmine, I’m also having difficulty understanding fuel cell technology. What is it exactly? Does anyone have a good definition?
November 12th, 2009 at 7:05 pm
I think that fuel cell technology is great, you can get a lot out of it. But, it’s very important to understand that it is currently unavailable because a) big oil is keeping it down and b) it’s just too expensive for the average joe
November 12th, 2009 at 7:08 pm
FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGY IS A WASTE OF MONEY AND INVESTMENT. THERE ARE A LOT BETTER CHOICES OUT THERE THAT CAN OUTLAST AND OUTDO FUEL CELL, LIKE SOLAR AND WIND ENERGY. AND LETS FACE IT THERE IS REALLY NO SUCH THING AS CLEAN ENERGY. ITS A CONCEPT INVENTED BY MAN TO PUSH SALES AND MARKETING. I’M NOT SAYING THAT EVERYONE SHOULD JUST GO AN LIVE IN A CAVE WITH NO LIGHT, ETC. BUT IT’S IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THE EASY THINGS THAT PEOPLE CAN DO TO AVOID SERIOUS ENERGY CONSUMPTION… THEN THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS OF ENERGY CAN BE SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASED AND TOXINS ELIMINATED.
November 12th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
sadg5,
I think that no energy is really clean energy because if fact there are a lot of components that go into constructing the solar panels, turbines, fuel cells, etc. But, ultimately the energy produced by the machines is more eco-friendly than that of fossil fuels. The point being, fuel cells are important because they decrease possible emissions and focus on making our economy less oil dependent.
I would recommend browsing the websites of those comments (simply click on their logo).
Hope you opinion changes,
Laurie